Editor David Berger is up to no good. Since trying to ride the sex abuse scandal on anti-Church magazine Der Spiegel for all it's worth, he's now taken to attacking the Pope. Cardinal Meisner does nothing.
The homosexually disordered David Berger spits poison and gall in the ecclesiastical pot from which he eats. Cardinal Meisner isn't bothered in the least.
(kreuz.net) The scatological-theological plump-plump of David Berger, who's still employed by the Archdiocese of Cologne, has broken off again.
He is bad mouthing the Pope for a dirty magazine known as "Fresh".
The laughable little devotional book says that Berger is to be congratulated for being a "high Church functionary".
The homosexual Berger is "in and out of the Vatican" -- insists this magazine.
The garbage theologian serves the magazine with his fantasizes about a supposed "inner life of the Catholic Church".
In reality Berger's insider knowledge, which he has put in a still-born smear novel already, doesn't exceed the level of the readers' opinions at 'kreuz.net', the largest Catholic news portal throughout all of Europe. [shameless plug]
He recalled for 'Fresh' his participation in a march, where he says he freely and finally let everyone know about his homosexual disorder.
That wasn't what happened. Bergers holy sheen was revealed by 'kreuz.net'. [he was dumb enough or indifferent enough to publish his activities on Facebook]
The Usual Unproven Suggestions
The magazine did not ask Berger the not unfair question, why the Pope offered his "thoughts about Homosexual Prostitutes".
Berger answered that he finds the Pope's insinuated ideas "completely fantastic", that a prostitute in the Vatican would call the Vatican and ask if he could use a condom.
In another context Berger could have said that the sexual disease of AIDS is so furiously spreading is because the Vatican forbids condoms.
Then Berger projects -- as is usual with him -- his sexual disturbances, this time on the Pope.
This one supposedly has himself "a permanent fixation on the theme of homosexuality".
In truth the present Pontifex never brings up the theme in his personal work.
Berger relies on his back alley gossiping, supposed theologians -- that he's invented himself.
From Berger's fantasy theologians are "almost all" of the view that Benedict XVI is "naturally homosexually inclined."
The Holy Father comes though from an ecclesiastical culture, in which the homosexual disorder is "an absolute taboo":
"What he has himself, he projects and attacks it" -- projects Berger as usual.
The Gomorrhist is even setting rumors loose in the world, which can make him some money.
There are "earlier homosexual contacts of the Pope".
Face these unscrupulous calumnies the Cardinal of Cologne will not deal with much longer, as if Berger were not a Church contracted religion instructor in his Archdiocese.
Berger calls upon the conspiracy theoress Valeska von Roques to substantiate his slanders for 'Fresh'.
She has according to Berger, validated the "evidence" that the Pope had even in his time in Rome as Cardinal "attended regular homosexual contacts".
The problem: Why is Frau von Roques telling these things to an inconsequential homosexual, instead of earning a pile of gold then -- if the allegations are true?
According to Berger's story, Mrs von Roques theories rely on the word of a Swiss guard and others active in the Vatican.
In any event Cardinal Ratzinger didn't live in the Vatican and would have been deprived of the prying eyes of the Swiss Guard.
Homosexual Berger is also slandering the Bishop Franz-Joseph Overbeck of Essen.
He's already criticized the homosexuals from Hell, in order to become the next Cardinal in Cologne.
Berger concludes: If another Pope would promote the same underwear themes, "then [Msgr.] Overbeck would say the opposite".